đ XPRIZE recently released its fourth annual Circular Carbon (CC) Market Report analysing 2023 investment and growth trends of this emerging industry which encompasses a range of strategies aimed at mitigating climate impact, including Carbon Dioxide Removal (#CDR).
The Circular Carbon Network (CCN) spans over 55 countries and nearly 1,000 companies which have raised over $25.4 billion to date, and constituted 25% of overall investment in Climate Tech in 2023.Â
đ The report highlights huge progress in the CDR market over the past year: 665 companies in the CCN were CDR companies, an astounding 66%. They raised a total of $5.8B in 2023, reflecting the increasing recognition of CDR's critical role in achieving global carbon neutrality.
Key highlights:
đ Despite a challenging year for capital markets, including the first downturn in climate tech investments since 2021, the CDR sector experienced a notable surge in funding of $1.7B more capital compared to 2022 as well as a 70% increase in the number of deals compared to the previous year.Â
đ± Remarkably, early-stage CDR ventures captured 13% of all capital within the broader climate tech sector, signalling the thriving investor interest in pioneering carbon removal technologies and their potential to revolutionise our approach to climate change.
đš Direct Air Capture (#DAC) technologies have emerged as the technology taking on the most investments in the CDR space, securing over half the total raised for carbon removal ($3.1B of the $5.8B).Â
đČ Land-based solutions such as biochar, BECCS, and reforestation raised $2.2B of investment this year. These technologies have not only demonstrated scalability but also efficacy in carbon sequestration, making them attractive to investors and policymakers alike.
đ Despite the overall growth in CDR investment, ocean-based and rock-based solutions remain underfunded in comparison ($0.4B and $1.4B respectively). This gap presents an opportunity for targeted investment to unlock the full spectrum of CDR potential, ensuring a balanced and effective approach to carbon removal.
đ€ What do you think? Which areas remain underfunded? What technologies hold the most promise?
 đ Full report here.
Comments