top of page

šŸ¦„ Myth buster: a ton of CDR should cost $100 or less šŸ¦„

Writer's picture: sebmanhartsebmanhart


šŸ’ø New week, new myth. The magical ā‚¬100/t. An often promised number that CDR startups are expected to reach at scale.


šŸ˜® Tighten your seatbelts, folks: this might never happen. Nor does it need to.


Hear me out.


1ļøāƒ£ Letā€™s start by looking at the cost of other materials at scale.

No processed material/commodity in the world is that cheap. Even cement, one of the worldā€™s most used materials, costs around $125/t. Crude oil around $550/t, and desalinated water $1,000/t. These are materials we have developed insanely efficient processes for over decades.


2ļøāƒ£ What if we consider CDR a ā€˜waste managementā€™ issue.

While highly variable across geographies and regions, the cost to dispose of commercial waste ranges between $20-$150/t. More complex waste, e.g. construction or hazardous waste, can quickly reach $100-$200+ per ton. CDR - a labour/energy intensive approach that is capturing a very dilute gas from the atmosphere and then has to store the ā€œwasteā€ carbon safely for millennia - is more akin to complex waste management and thus hard to imagine at <$100/t.


3ļøāƒ£ That brings me to another point that people often forget to factor in: inflation. Oh yeah, that. Assuming normal rates of inflation (and what is ā€œnormalā€ today?) weā€™d be landing at anywhere between $150-$250/t.


āœØ So is $100/t out of the question? No. I still believe it is possible, but only for CDR where the carbon credits constitute just a part of the revenue stream, e.g. biochar carbon removal (hashtag#BCR) or hashtag#BECCS. Other approaches ā€“ and one could argue the ones with the clearest case for additionality ā€“ like hashtag#DACCS will just not reach this magical target.


šŸ“‰ Finally, do we need CDR to cost $100/t to hit our climate targets? I donā€™t think so. On the voluntary side, studies have shown that at $150-$200/t we would already see a huge uptick in demand. On the compliance side, if we are to primarily tackle the residual 5-15% of emissions, there are plenty of decarbonisation options below $150/t we can and should do first.


šŸ•ŗ Real talk: can we just drop the $100/t talk and instead anchor the ideal CDR cost in more tangible concepts such as real abatement costs, the social cost of carbon or the cost of sustainable aviation fuel?


ā“ What is your take? What am I missing here?




Comments


  • LinkedIn

© 2023 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page