top of page

This week: carbon dioxide removal (#CDR) #targets in Europe.


Setting clear CDR targets is critical to driving the scale-up of carbon removal and therefore having a shot at staying below 1.5 or, more likely, 2 degrees of #globalwarming.


Over the last 4 months, we at Carbonfuture (with the help of Alexis Dunand) carried out wide-ranging research on where #climatepolicy in Europe is at. We looked at all 27 EU member states + 4 non-EU states: ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง



๐Ÿค” 11 countries have no CDR targets whatsoever. Another 11 only have targets for land-use, land-use change, and forestry (#LULUCF). This highlights the current lack of awareness of, and knowledge in, novel/high-quality CDR among policy makers in Europe.


๐Ÿ”Ž For those that have set goals, we see two very different approaches: setting a % of total emissions vs setting a specific amount in tonnes removed. Both can work, although a % seems to make more sense to me personally.


๐ŸŽฏ When a % amount is set, it seems to fall between 5-15%. Portugal ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น - the only country in the ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ with a CDR target enshrined into law - goes so far as to cap it at a maximum of 10%, a potential smart move to prevent CDR from being used to avoid #decarbonisation.


๐Ÿš€ Switzerland๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญhas the most advanced CDR legislation in Europe, specifying targets for each decade for domestic CDR & #CCS (2030: 0.5Mt, 2040: 2Mt, 2050: 7Mt). It even goes as far as stating that it will need 5Mt of additional CDR from abroad, a sign that it does not expect to be able to achieve net-zero with purely domestic measures.


๐Ÿ’ช In the Nordics, Denmark ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ (at least 2Mt/y through biochar in the agriculture sector) and Sweden ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช (up to 15% of total emissions, including non-CDR offsets) keep leading the way with very specific targets, but no target for CDR as a whole (likely to change soon).


๐Ÿ’ก The European powerhouses Germany ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช and France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท look promising: ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช has a target in the Coalition Agreement (5%), but not yet enshrined in law. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท forecasts 10Mt/year by 2050 in its long-term strategy (#LTS). More movement can be expected here soon.



โ†ช This all paints an interesting picture. It highlights that a lot more #advocacy work is needed to get clear CDR targets - alongside dedicated emission reductions targets - enshrined into law across Europe. Time to get to work!


Does this resonate with your experiences? Where do you see the biggest potential?


๐Ÿ“ฃ Watch this space for more maps and analysis ๐Ÿ“ฃ


The underlying raw data will also all be open-source shortly.

Comments


  • LinkedIn

© 2023 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page